A
Dallas Morning News columnist
recounts his experience when a a product he purchases doesn't include a component part that is supposed to be included.
I thought this was interesting and a bit odd. First, Sony is to blame, not Target. Secondly, I'd just buy the missing component part. Sure, there has to be a price that would be unacceptable to me, but I'm not spending two to three hours jacking with that problem unless I absolutely have to.
(And why did he throw in there his speculation of the salary of the Target employee? Especially from a guy who works in maybe the lowest paid industry in the nation.)